Canada - Intersection of anti-treaty shopping proposals, BEPS action plan 

April 9: Canadian multinational and foreign corporations need to consider the alignment of Canada’s proposed anti-treaty shopping regime (announced by the Canadian government in its 2014 federal budget) with the OECD’s discussion draft on treaty abuse prevention under the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) action plan.

Read BEPS in TaxNewsFlash: Canada - Proposal to prevent “treaty shopping”


The OECD discussion draft was released pursuant to BEPS Action 6, "Prevent treaty abuse.”

KPMG observation

What changes could Canadian taxpayers see if Canada—or Canada’s treaty partners—adopt the proposals outlined in the OECD discussion draft?


Currently, the only tax treaty containing a comprehensive limitations on benefits (LOB) clause is the treaty between Canada and the United States. Therefore, some might claim Canada has limited experience in applying these more complex and restrictive requirements.


It is also not entirely clear how the Canadian proposals for a domestic anti-treaty shopping regime would interact or overlap with the OECD’s proposals, and whether Canadian taxpayers would be required to comply with two comprehensive, but different, anti-treaty shopping regimes.


Read an April 2014 report [PDF 58 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Canada: OECD’s New Approach to Combat Treaty Abuse




©2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

Subscribe

Current and future KPMG clients may subscribe to TaxNewsFlash email alerts.


Email your contact information.

TaxNewsFlash-United States by year