KPMG report - States aim at expanding sales and use tax nexus 

April 29: The number of states attempting to expand their reach over out-of-state retailers through “nexus legislation” similar to laws enacted in other states continues to grow.

In general, the legislative proposals include click-through nexus provisions and expanded affiliate and / or attributional nexus rules.


Only one state—Kansas—has thus far enacted such legislation. Another bill has been passed by the West Virginia legislature and is pending action by the governor. Given that New York's highest court recently upheld the constitutionality of New York’s click-through nexus statute (read TaxNewsFlash-United States (March 28, 2013)) it could be likely that lawmakers in more states might follow suit.


Other states that have considered or are currently considering click- through nexus or expanded affiliate and / or attributional nexus bills include Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Utah.

Kansas

In addition to click-through nexus, Kansas Senate Bill 83 (signed April 16, 2013) establishes a presumption that a retailer has nexus for sales and use tax if a person with Kansas nexus:


  • Sells a line of products similar to the retailer under a business name that is the same or similar to the retailer
  • Maintains a warehouse in Kansas that facilitates the delivery of property to the retailer's customers
  • Uses trademarks, service marks, or trade names in Kansas that are the same as or substantially similar to the retailer's
  • Delivers, installs, or performs maintenance services for the retailer's customers in Kansas
  • Facilitates the retailer's sale of property to customers
  • Has a franchisee or licensee operating under the retailer's trade name
  • Conducts any other activities in Kansas that are significantly associated with the retailer's ability to maintain a market in the state for sales

Under all these circumstances, the presumption of nexus can be rebutted if it is demonstrated that the activities of the in-state persons are not significantly associated with the retailer’s ability to establish or maintain a market in the state for sales.

West Virginia

West Virginia House Bill 2754, passed by both houses of the West Virginia legislature and currently awaiting action by the governor, would generally deem that nexus exists for an out-of-state seller if an entity related to or unitary with the seller:


  • Maintains a place of business in the state
  • Performs services in the state in connection with the goods or services sold by the seller or any related entity, or
  • Solicits business in the state for the seller.

Unlike Kansas Senate Bill 83, the West Virginia bill does not allow a seller to rebut the presumption that nexus exists.


Read this April 2013 report prepared by KPMG’s State and Local Tax practice: Multistate: A Number of States Introduce Legislation Aimed at Expanding Sales and Use Tax Nexus




©2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

Subscribe

Current and future KPMG clients may subscribe to TaxNewsFlash email alerts.


Email your contact information.

TaxNewsFlash-United States by year