Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, Global Compliance Management Services
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 5/8/2013

India - Tribunal examines transfer pricing’s “deemed international transaction” requirement 

May 8:  The Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that for a transaction to be subject to India’s transfer pricing rules as a “deemed international transaction,” the transaction must in fact be an international transaction—that is, one or both of the parties to the transaction must be non-residents. Kodak India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACT (ITA No. 7349/Mum/2012)

The tribunal also held that the Transfer Pricing Officer cannot apply any method other than a prescribed method in the statute for purposes of determining the arm’s length price of the transaction.


In a second issue, the tribunal rejected a proposed transfer pricing adjustment because the adjustment was within the 5% safe harbor.

Summary

The case concerns two issues:


  • An asset purchase agreement
  • Mark-up on reimbursements

On the first issue, the taxpayer sold its medical-imaging business through an asset purchase agreement. Because there were foreign holding companies involved, the Transfer Pricing Officer determined the arm’s length price of the transaction based on the ratio of revenue earned by the taxpayer in India, as compared to its global revenue, and proposed a transfer pricing adjustment of over U.S. $19 million. The taxpayer asserted that the transaction was between two Indian entities and therefore not subject to the “deemed international transaction” rules.


The tribunal agreed that the transaction was a domestic one and thus not subject to the transfer pricing provisions. The decision provides guidance on interpreting the term “deemed international transaction” under the statute. Also, it was pointed out that the “corporate veil” cannot be pierced absent proof that the foreign related party influences the business affairs and decisions of the domestic entity.


Concerning the second issue, the taxpayer incurred employee-related expenses and advertising and award sponsorship costs on behalf of its related parties and recovered these expenses using a cost-plus 10% mark-up. The Transfer Pricing Officer applied a mark-up of 12.5%.


Before the tribunal, the taxpayer contended that the transfer pricing adjustment came within the then-applicable safe harbor range of 5%, and as such, the adjustment could not be sustained. The tribunal agreed.


Read a May 2013 report [PDF 184 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Existence of elements of international transaction is a must for any transaction to qualify as deemed international transaction under the transfer pricing provisions



Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.




©2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

 

Share this

Share this

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)


Already a Subscriber? Login


Not a member? Subscribe now

Contact us