• Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, Global Compliance Management Services, International Tax
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 6/11/2014

India - No adjustment given taxpayer’s minimal risks, limited functions 

June 11: The Delhi Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal set aside a transfer pricing adjustment with respect to a taxpayer involved in performing what were found to be low-end mediation services in India for its foreign related parties. Marubeni Corp., Japan (ITA No: 5397/Del/2012)


The operations of the taxpayer (a wholly owned subsidiary of a Japanese corporation) primarily consisted of agency services provided on behalf of the Japanese parent corporation and other group member companies. The taxpayer acted as liaison between the various business departments of the group companies and their suppliers and customers in India.

For the year at issue, the taxpayer selected for its five international transactions the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with the operating profit / operating cost as the profit level indicator. For the international transactions, the taxpayer’s margin was 16.87% (compared to 13.81% for comparables based on multiple years’ data). Accordingly, the taxpayer claimed that its international transactions were at arm’s length.

Findings of the Transfer Pricing Officer

The Transfer Pricing Officer, however, determined that for one of the five transactions (the provision of agency and marketing support services) the taxpayer provided vital services to the related parties—services that were critical to the taxpayer’s sourcing services in India.

The Transfer Pricing Officer also found that the taxpayer made sizeable investments in exploring and analyzing the Indian market; and that the taxpayer developed unique intangibles that afforded an advantage to its related parties. Based in part on these findings, the Transfer Pricing Officer concluded that the taxpayer had not been adequately compensated by its related parties and that the Profit Split Method was required in order to determine the arm’s length price of the international transactions.

Alternatively, the Transfer Pricing Officer asserted that under the TNMM, the taxpayer was to be treated as a commission agent and, by applying a set of nine comparables, arrived at a mean margin of profit at 42.13% on cost.

Tribunal sets aside the adjustment

After analyzing the functions and risks of the taxpayer, and finding that the taxpayer acted as a service provider with minimal risks, the tribunal rejected the Transfer Pricing Officer’s contentions and set aside the transfer pricing adjustment.

The tribunal found that the taxpayer’s primary service was to act as a mediator, and that the taxpayer was adequately compensated with a fixed fee for this activity. The tribunal looked to a chart / table provided by the taxpayer, to the Transfer Pricing Officer, and that showed for each transaction, the taxpayer’s risk was minimal with “least capital” being employed.

Read a June 2014 report [PDF 446 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Rejects the TPO’s approach of using a PSM for agency services; the taxpayer assumed minimal risk, performed limited functions

Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.

©2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.

KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.

The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.


Share this

Share this


Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)

Already a Subscriber? Login

Not a member? Subscribe now