U.S. Court of International Trade - Slip opinions for November 30 - December 7 

December 7:   The U.S. Court of International Trade posted and / or released the following opinions and actions for the period November 30 – December 7, 2012.

For an electronic version of text of the slip opinions, click on the direct hyperlink to the court’s website, as provided below:


  • Husqvarna Constr. Prods. North America et al., v. United States, Slip Op 12-150 (CIT December 6, 2012): A petition for a writ of mandamus on imports diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China; the plaintiffs seek to compel Commerce to set a “provisional cash deposit rate” and issue corresponding cash deposit instructions to CBP. The court found that no clear duty is imposed by the statutory time limits, and that there is no right to have the writ issue directing the assignment of a provisional cash deposit rate. Therefore, petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

    Read the opinion [PDF 75 KB]


  • Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria and Agricultura v. United States, Slip Op 12-149 (CIT December 6, 2012): Concerning orange juice from Brazil, the court found that the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review issued by Commerce were supported by substantial evidence and were otherwise in accordance with the law.

    Read the opinion [PDF 60 KB]


  • United States v. NJC Int'l, Inc., Slip Op 12-148 (CIT December 6, 2012): U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) asserted gross negligence on the part of an importer of goods alleged to be textile products from China subject to quota requirements, falsely declared to be of Hong Kong origin with an entered value of about $58,000. CBP alleged further that the principal officer knowingly participated in the falsehood. Because of a failure to respond to CPB’s motion for summary judgment and/or the court's order to show cause why judgment was not to be be entered, judgment entered jointly and severally against the two defendants for the sum certain claimed by CBP, together with post- judgment interest, as requested, and costs.

    Read the opinion [PDF 36 KB]


  • MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United States, Slip Op 12-146 (CIT November 30, 2012): Concerning Commerce's application of the all-others 374.15% countervailing duty rate to a group of exporters of extruded aluminum from China, the court affirmed Commerce's final results upon redetermination, in which Commerce explained how its assumption (that the exporters, like the mandatory respondents in this investigation, used 100% of subsidies available throughout China) was remedial and not punitive.

    Read the opinion [PDF 50KB]


  • Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Comm. v. United States, Slip Op 12-145 (CIT November 30, 2012): On motion to remand Commerce's review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from China, the court sustained Commerce’s mandatory respondent selection; remanded Commerce’s selection of India as the primary surrogate country for China; and deferred judgment regarding Commerce’s labor valuation, as well as Commerce’s decision not to exclude data on Indian imports from North Korea when calculating surrogate labor factor of production values.

    Read the opinion [PDF 65 KB]

The following opinion is confidential (public version to be posted when available):


  • Advanced Tech. & Materials Co., Ltd v. United States, Slip Op 12-147 (November 30, 2012)


For more information, contact a professional with KPMG’s Trade & Customs practice:


Douglas Zuvich

(312) 665-1022


Andrew Siciliano

(631) 425-6057


John L. McLoughlin

(267) 256-2614


Todd R. Smith

(949) 885-5617


Luis A. Abad

(212) 954-3094


Amie Ahanchian

(202) 533-3247


Or your local KPMG Trade & Customs professional.




©2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

Subscribe

Current and future KPMG clients may subscribe to TaxNewsFlash email alerts.


Email your contact information.

Other TaxNewsFlash publications

TaxNewsFlash-Trade & Customs by year