United Kingdom

Details

  • Industry: Financial Services, Insurance
  • Type: Business and industry issue
  • Date: 06/02/2013

The light bite? FATCA for non-Financial Institutions 

The 117 pages of draft documentation released by HMRC on 18th December to implement the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) along with the 544 pages of the final Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations are quite a banquet of rules and regulations. 

 

In this fifth article on FATCA, we consider the pertinent points for non-Specified Insurance Companies (e.g. Property and Casualty insurers) which prove to be a much lighter meal.  We also highlight some of the differences between the IGA and the IRS regulations.  All UK insurers should comply with the IGA and there is a penalty regime for non-compliance.

 

Is the light bite available to you?  Considerations include:

Banquet or Vegetable Sticks?

The key question is: Does the insurer write Cash Value Insurance Contracts or any Annuity Contracts?  If so this will render it a Financial Institution (FI) required to register with the IRS.  Most P&C insurers will not write such business.  Indeed, an insurer that writes only exempt products will be a Specified Insurance Company without any Financial Accounts.


It is worth checking the insurer does not satisfy the definition of any other type of FI or Foreign Financial Institution (FFI) under the IRS regulations.


As indemnity reinsurance is excluded from being a Cash Value Insurance Contract the one to watch is Financial Reinsurance, as writing this would cause the insurer to be an FI.  Although it would only be a reportable account if the cedant were a non-participating FI and it is the reinsurer’s responsibility to establish the cedant’s FATCA/IGA status.


Celery or Carrot sticks; which type of NFFE?
If the insurer is not an FI, it must be a Non-Financial Foreign Entity.  But which one – Active or Passive?  What difference does it make?


An active NFFE does not have to provide any self-certification if the FI it interacts with can determine from public information (used in the process of opening an account) that it is indeed an active NFFE, for example, if it is in a group with a listed company.  In practice, some banks may, as part of their IGA compliant account opening procedures, request certification of the insurer’s IGA status.


Passive NFFEs are required to certify that there are no Controlling Persons that are US Persons.  Controlling Person is to be interpreted in a manner consistent with UK Anti-Money Laundering legislation (i.e. 25% ownership).  In contrast, the IRS requires that any interest in a non-US company that is more than 10% directly or indirectly owned by a US person is reported. 


The form of the certification is still awaited, however, the HMRC guidance suggests that in the UK the completion of the IRS forms may not be required.  Currently, it is down to each FI to decide on the exact form.


Cream cakes to finish: What next?
Although there could be minimal impact on these insurers, there are some next steps which have to be taken:

  • Classify the organisation.  Could it be another type of FI or FFI, such as a depositary FFI?
  • Communicate the findings to the board or audit committee. 
  • Allocate responsibility for completing the certification requirements and maintenance of the records to an individual or department.


Should you have any questions on how your business might be affected, or require assistance with your FATCA project, please contact your usual KPMG contact or Jeanette Cook.

 

IN COMPLIANCE WITH US STANDARDS OF TAX PRACTICE PRESCRIBED BY THE US TREASURY THAT APPLY TO ALL US TAX ADVISERS, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ANY US TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.