Details

  • Service: Tax
  • Type: Business and industry issue
  • Date: 5/12/2011

Contact us

  Ross McKinley

Ross McKinley

Partner, Tax

+64 9 367 5904 

rdmckinley@kpmg.co.nz


 

 

Rachel Piper

 

Partner, Tax

64 9 363 3525

Submission - Depreciation of commercial fit-out 

This Submission contains our comment on ED 0140 – Depreciation of Commercial Fit-Out (the “Exposure Draft”).
Download Now
PDF files require Adobe Reader to view

ED 0140 – Depreciation of Commercial Fit-Out released by the Inland Revenue concludes that:

 

  • Where items of commercial fit-out have been historically depreciated as part of the cost of a building, the correct treatment is for these items to continue to be depreciated at the building rate (this is 0% from the 2011-12 income year).


  • Taxpayers cannot retrospectively separate-out fit-out items from the building, as this is a matter of “regretted choice” (Inland Revenue will only allow re-characterisation if there is a genuine error).


KPMG disagrees that depreciation of commercial fit-out, at the building depreciation rate, is a matter of regretted choice.

 

If a taxpayer has not turned their mind to the depreciation alternatives (or is simply not aware that there are options), we do not see how “regretted choice” can be reasonably argued by the Commissioner.

Tax submissions - Submissions on draft tax legislation, Government discussion documents and issues papers, & various tax interpretation statements released by the New Zealand Inland Revenue. 
Share

Sign up now

Subscribe to selected content and receive email alerts when new content is available for viewing on this site.

 

Already a member? Login

 

Not a member? Register

Tax

Our tax advisory team has the skills, commitment and experience to help you to be competitive and compliant.