Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, Global Compliance Management Services
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 1/28/2013

Portugal - Arm’s length measures in cash pooling transactions 

January 28:   A Portuguese court (Tribunal Arbitral) found for the taxpayer that the comparable uncontrolled transactions, as selected by the tax authorities (either to benchmark the interest rate for creditor balances or for guarantee / warranty purposes), were not “reliable” because the selected transactions did not provide for the highest degree of comparability as required for the application of the CUP method.

Summary

The case concerns a transfer pricing adjustment made by the Portuguese tax authorities for fiscal year 2008.


The tax authorities found that the arm's length principle had not been applied under a cash pooling agreement involving a Portuguese taxpayer and its foreign parent company and a foreign bank.


The tax authorities selected the comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method as the most appropriate transfer pricing method, and identified certain uncontrolled transactions with which to benchmark the interest rates used in creditor balances and under guarantee / warranty agreements.


The taxpayer did not agree with the transfer pricing adjustment, and filed a tax claim (Reclamação Graciosa) in which it asserted that the CUP method was not the most appropriate method and that its application could only lead to incorrect conclusions and adjustments.


The taxpayer asserted that given the unusual nature of the cash pooling agreement, it had to be analyzed on an aggregate basis—with the profit split method being the most appropriate method because that method would allow for a determination of the proper distribution of the cash pooling benefits among the participants.

Court decision

The court concluded that the tax adjustments infringed on the rules underlying the use of the CUP method for transfer pricing purposes.


In particular, the court found that the comparable uncontrolled transactions used by the tax authorities (either to benchmark the interest rate for creditor balances or the alleged warranty) were not “reliable” because the selected transactions did not provide for the highest degree of comparability that is required for the application of the CUP method. The court, thus, concluded in the taxpayer’s favor.

KPMG observation

Tax professionals in Portugal look to the recent decision of the court and the current difficulties in obtaining bank credit in Portugal (which have caused several companies that are part of a group to use cash pooling systems as an alternative of financing) as support for the premise that taxpayers must prepare robust transfer pricing analyses and select the most appropriate methodologies to support the arm’s length nature of their complex financial transactions.



For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG’s Global Transfer Pricing Services Group in Portugal:


Luis Magalhães

+ 351 210 110 087


Catarina Breia

+ 351 220 102 353




©2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

 

Share this

Share this

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)


Already a Subscriber? Login


Not a member? Subscribe now

Contact us