Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, Global Compliance Management Services
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 2/15/2013

India - No tax benefits claimed, no transfer pricing adjustment  

February 15: The Pune Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that the transfer pricing rules do not apply to an international transaction when the taxpayer itself “disallowed” (i.e., claimed no tax benefit) for payments made to a related party and further did not claim any tax benefit for the transaction in subsequent years (by capitalizing and amortizing the amount).

The case is: Eaton Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT [ITA Nos. 1621/PN/2011] Assessment Year 2007-08

Background

The taxpayer (an Indian subsidiary) provided customer support service and business support service to the international group.


The taxpayer provided its customer support service from a “software technology park of India” (STPI) unit and claimed a “tax holiday” pursuant to section 10A of the India’s income tax law. The business support services were rendered from a non-STPI location.


The taxpayer was reimbursed on the basis of cost, plus a mark-up. The taxpayer also reimbursed the related-party group for certain pre-incorporation costs.


The Transfer Pricing Officer accepted the taxpayer’s treatment of the customer support service, but (1) rejected the taxpayer’s benchmark of the business support service, using multiple-year data and sought instead to use single-year data of comparable companies; and (2) concluded that the taxpayer’s reimbursement to the group for its pre-incorporation costs was an international transaction that ought to have been benchmarked.


The Dispute Resolution Panel agreed with the Transfer Pricing Officer’s findings, as did the Assessment Officer.

Tribunal’s decision

The Pune tribunal concluded that the risk adjustment claimed by the taxpayer for the support services had not been properly addressed by the tax authorities and remanded this issue for additional consideration.


Concerning the taxpayer’s payment to the related party for reimbursement for the pre-incorporation expenses, the tribunal found that while the arm’s length rule generally would apply, the taxpayer had not claimed and in fact had “disallowed” the expense in computing its taxable income. Thus, the taxpayer had not realized any benefit in the assessment year or in later years (by capitalizing the amount and claiming depreciation).


Read a February 2013 report [PDF 200 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Transfer pricing provisions are not applicable, when taxpayer suo-moto disallows expenditure in the nature of international transaction and does not claim any benefit for the same in subsequent years



Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.




©2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

 

Share this

Share this

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)


Already a Subscriber? Login


Not a member? Subscribe now

Contact us