Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, Global Compliance Management Services, International Tax
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 11/22/2013

India - Assessment deferred under MAP proceedings involving U.S. taxpayer 

November 22:  The Bombay High Court held that when a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) allows for assessment proceedings to be deferred and for tax collection efforts to be suspended for prior years, the tax assessment deferral and collection suspension also may apply to subsequent years, provided the taxpayer furnishes an adequate bond guarantee. UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc. v. ADIT/DIT

The High Court directed India’s tax department to issue an appropriate “nil" withholding tax certificate for the taxpayer’s subsequent assessment year, provided the taxpayer agreed to maintain the bank guarantee that previously had been provided to secure payment of tax and interest.

Background

The taxpayer (a U.S. express delivery company) entered into an agreement with an Indian company to provide services with respect to the delivery of parcels outside India (parcels originating in India) and with respect to the delivery of parcels to be delivered in India (parcels originating outside India).


The taxpayer received income for services rendered for outbound parcels, and paid amounts with respect to inbound parcels. The taxpayer claimed that the amounts received from overseas customers in respect of parcels being delivered in India was not taxable in India. The Assessing Officer did not agree with this position.


For assessment years (AYs) 2001-02 to 2009-10, the taxpayer filed a MAP application to the U.S. Competent Authority and, pursuant to provisions of the India-United States income tax treaty, claimed that income received from the Indian company was not taxable. Later, the taxpayer made an application to include AY 2010-11 in the MAP proceedings.


The Competent Authorities of India and the United States, being aware of the hardship that the taxpayer faced during the pendency of the MAP proceedings, entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU), and agreed to defer the tax assessment and suspend collection of tax, provided the taxpayer furnished a bank guarantee securing the tax liability.


The Assessing Officer issued a “nil” withholding certificates for AY 2007-2008 to AY 2009-10, but decided not to grant the certificate for AY 2010-11.

High Court’s decision

The High Court held that the subsequent assessment year was also covered by the original MAP application, provided that the taxpayer undertook to keep the already furnished bank guarantee “alive” and to provide a further bank guarantee if necessary to secure the tax liability adequately.


The case turned on the definition of “admitted”—that is, the Indian Competent Authority must admit (acknowledge) that the MAP proceedings have been invoked by the taxpayer through the U.S. Competent Authority.


Read a November 2013 report [PDF 449 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: MAP initiated under the India-USA tax treaty for deferment of assessment proceedings and suspension of collection of taxes for past year would also cover subsequent year



Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.




©2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

 

Share this

Share this

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)


Already a Subscriber? Login


Not a member? Subscribe now