• Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 12/26/2013

India - Arm’s length price for sourcing support services 

December 26: The Delhi High Court held that the Transfer Pricing Officer’s determination of an arm’s length price based on a 5% markup of the “free on board” (FOB) value of goods sourced for a related party’s contract with third parties was contrary to the transfer pricing rules under India’s income tax law and regulations. Li & Fung (India) Private Ltd. v. CIT (ITA No. 306 of 2012)


The taxpayer during the financial year 2005-06 provided sourcing support services to its Hong Kong-based related party. In return, the taxpayer received remuneration of its costs plus 5%.

The taxpayer applied the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) to determine an arm’s length price for the remuneration, and used the “operating profit / total cost” as the profit-level indicator.

On examination, the Transfer Pricing Officer accepted that TNMM was the most appropriate method for determining the arm’s length price, and accepted the comparables selected by the taxpayer. However, the Transfer Pricing Officer determined that the “cost” (for purposes of the 5% markup) must include the FOB value of exports (i.e., exports of an Indian manufacturer to overseas third parties).

The Dispute Resolution Panel agreed with this determination, but reduced the markup to 3% of FOB value of exports.

The taxpayer first sought review by a tribunal, which generally affirmed the Transfer Pricing Officer’s findings that the cost-plus markup adopted by the taxpayer was not at arm’s length, and held that the transfer pricing adjustment cannot exceed the amount retained by a related party from total remuneration received from third-party customers.

The taxpayer appealed to the High Court, claiming that the cost-plus markup of 5% of FOB value of goods in transactions between third-party enterprises was not in compliance with India’s transfer pricing rules (i.e., that the rules contained no provision for considering costs incurred by third parties in computing the net profit margin of international transactions).

The High Court agreed with the taxpayer, holding that the transfer pricing rules do not provide for use of the FOB value of exports to determine the arm’s length price.

The decision affirms some basic principles related to the application of the TNMM for determining the arm’s length price in situations that concern sourcing of support services transactions.

Read a December 2013 report [PDF 467 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: The Delhi High Court allows the appeal in favour of the taxpayer by reversing the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Li & Fung India Private Limited. Holds TPO’s determination of the arm’s length price for sourcing support services based on markup on FOB value of exports contrary to the provisions of the law

Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.

©2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.

KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.

The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.


Share this

Share this


Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)

Already a Subscriber? Login

Not a member? Subscribe now