Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Transfer Pricing Services, International Tax
  • Type: Regulatory update
  • Date: 3/14/2014

Australia - Proposals to simplify arm’s length-debt test (thin capitalization) 

March 14:  Australia’s current thin capitalisation regime prevents excessive debt allocation to Australian multinational businesses by imposing safe harbour limits.

Currently, if the debt-equity ratio exceeds 75%, then a portion of interest expense will be non-deductible—unless the “arm’s length” debt test can be satisfied.


Unlike the safe harbour test, the arm’s length test is a qualitative test, placing the onus on taxpayers to prove their debt levels funding its Australian business are at “arm’s length” to justify the full interest deduction, often requiring taxpayers to seek a private ruling from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).


With the government proposing to reduce the safe harbour gearing limits down from 75% to 60%, greater reliance on the arm’s length debt test is expected for those borderline cases that may breach safe harbour test under the changed law.

Seven alternatives being considered

As a result of the heightened focus and expected reliance on the arm’s length test, the Board of Taxation is currently considering alternative ways to simplify the current arm’s length test and to make it easier for the ATO to administer.


The seven reform proposals the Board is considering include:


  • Remove the annual testing requirement
  • Review the factual assumptions in determining the arm’s length debt test (so that it looks prospectively only)
  • Additional safe harbour tests based on earnings
  • Simplify the arm’s length debt test when there is no related-party debt
  • Allow credit support from related parties
  • Facilitate advanced thin capitalisation agreements
  • Further guidance on current technical issues—e.g., clarifying the type of special purposes entities to obtain the exemption from the thin capitalisation rules (allowing interest expense to be 100% tax deductible)

KPMG observation

All of the proposed options have merit. Low-asset service companies or companies with valuable intangibles may benefit, from a compliance perspective, from a safe harbour test based on earnings or interest cover ratio (like New Zealand) as an alternative to the arm’s length and safe harbour tests. These companies may currently be disadvantaged because these valuable assets are not recognised under the current safe harbour test (in that they are not assets recognised for accounting purposes), thereby distorting their true debt-equity ratio.


Read a March 2014 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Australia: Seven ways to reform Thin Capitalisation Arm's Length Debt Test



Contact a tax professional with KPMG's Global Transfer Pricing Services.




©2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.


The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International.


KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever.


The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.


Direct comments, including requests for subscriptions, to us-kpmgwnt@kpmg.com.
For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at:

+ 1 202 533 4366

1801 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006.

 

Share this

Share this

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the latest TaxNewsFlash email alerts (you must select the option for TaxNewsFlash)


Already a Subscriber? Login


Not a member? Subscribe now