Global

Details

  • Service: Enterprise, Family business
  • Type: Business and industry issue
  • Date: 11/11/2013

Managing concurrency in a family business 

Managing concurrency
Joshua Nacht and Peter Begalla were recently published in the Family Business Magazine, saying that family firms must learn to manage concurrency:

"The challenges that family businesses face are not single events; they are ongoing, evolving and often unsolvable. If we approach them as problems that require a solution, we waste our valuable time and energy.


The most successful family businesses have developed the vital capacity to manage polarities in concurrency as an ongoing resource."

Managing concurrency

It’s often said that good management is about making the right trade-offs and, indeed, there are many trade-offs in family business leadership given the competing demand of the business logic and the family logic:


  • family vs. non-family executives
  • profit distribution vs. business growth
  • meritocracy vs. kinship relations…

Family businesses grapple with issues like this often. Yet, some of the most successful families develop collective decision processes over time that allow them to accept inherent dichotomies as opportunities instead of problems to be solved. It’s about replacing either/or thinking with both/and thinking.

Accepting inherent dichotomies as opportunities

Nacht and Begalla draw from research and models in the managing paradox literature to explain how family leaders may be able to avoid having to choose between opposing interests and instead be able to embrace the inherent duality and manage for concurrency:


“As Schuman and coauthors noted in ‘Family Business as Paradox’, risk/stability, individual/team, harvest/invest tend to be viewed by family business owners as choices. But often, choosing one or the other prevents family firms from succeeding to their fullest potential."


Both poles must be developed consistently over time in order for the family and the business to truly thrive.

Family business as paradox

Good management may be about making the right trade-offs, but great management that leads to long-term family business success may require breaking those trade-offs. Instead of asking, “Am I focused on the success of the business, or the harmony of my family?”, ask: “How can I ensure I have business success and family harmony?


“Do we rely on how we have always done things, or do we try something new?” can be asked as: “How can we utilise our experience of what has worked in the past and incorporate some fresh new ideas?”


In the words of Nacht and Begalla:


“It may not be enough to wear the “business hat” sometimes, and then take it off to wear the “family hat.” This approach is reflective of either/or thinking, and is unnecessarily limiting. We need to develop the ability to wear both hats at the same time.”


For more on this, watch this video of Ivan Lansberg calling for family business leaders to become ambidextrous and build their skills at leading both the enterprise and the family.


Filipe Santos

Filipe Santos
Filipe Santos is Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at INSEAD. He is the director for the Maag International Centre for Entrepreneurship and the academic director of the INSEAD Social Entrepreneurship Initiative.
 

Share this

Share this

KPMG Family Business

Family business
We know that being a part of a family business can often be a lonely place, with unique challenges, and we at KPMG wanted to create a way to share experiences and start a conversation around family business.

Country Leaders

world map
View KPMG Family Business leaders around the world.

Infographics

Keeping business in the family
A key driver of Asian economies

Global family business
Family business governance

How Australian Family Businesses are leading the way
Survival of family firms vs. non-family firms

Sages family story learn more Sages family story
  • Subscribe to related feeds