There have been a number of step changes in the consultancy market over the last decade and I don’t think that many of us really anticipated the manner in which it would evolve. As it is, the Big 4 are now back in favour and represent one of the most significant growth sectors in the consulting market.
I believe this rapid turnaround is down to the fact that the market has effectively demanded the return of all the Big 4 to the consultancy space.
The rapid growth rates achieved in the consultancy space by the returning members of the Big 4 is testament to that fact – and proves this was not simply a case of well-timed opportunism.
However, as we know only too well from our own experiences at the turn of the millennium, the rise of one player (or type of player) forces another to retreat. Just as the Big 4 were forced back by the rise of the technology-focused outfits, the tables have now turned and I believe that those established players who focus more on mass volume technology offerings may now find themselves squeezed out.
At the turn of the millennium, everyone seemed to be intimidated by technology, painfully aware of their own lack of knowledge – whether it was to do with the spectre of Y2K or how to establish completely new, technology-enabled, business models. Understandably, businesses were nervous about trusting advisors who could advise on a technology business case but who did not offer any sort of implementation service. Consequently, everyone, including the Big 4, became systems integrators.
It was at this point that we recognised the systems integration market was going to consolidate rapidly and we took the decision to exit, leaving the space to the big, global technology players.
Since then, most people have become more comfortable with the role of technology and what is involved in successful implementation. New players have emerged, particularly from India, and standard coding and configuration has become heavily commoditised. Many business leaders have become more savvy users of technology in their own right, no longer merely delegating IT issues to the CIO but wanting to ensure they understand the key business drivers themselves and how these would be addressed by the technology.
What I’m seeing is that many businesses want more from their advisors than just a functional understanding of technology. They want advisors who can leverage their greater knowledge of the regulatory, competitive and tax environments in which businesses operate and who are not merely trying to sell a new system or outsourcing contract.
And so the situation comes full circle – with companies apparently placing greater value on the broader business led advisory offering, rather than the pure technology implementation offering, and preferring advisors who are not looking to sell technology solutions or large volumes of systems integration or outsourcing work.
In this middle ground of the consultancy space, where elements of strategy and technology combine, the volume technology players may thus find themselves squeezed by the returning Big 4 on one front and the emerging offshore providers (able to undercut them on price) on the other.
That squeeze shows no sign of abating just yet as the return to favour of the Big 4 continues; a trend which, I believe, will allow these organizations to dominate the high value middle ground of the consultancy market for the foreseeable future.
Aidan Brennan is Global Head of Performance & Technology at KPMG
KPMG is a global network of professional firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. We operate in 144 countries and have 140,000 people working in member firms around the world. The independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Each KPMG firm is a legally distinct and separate entity and describes itself as such.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of KPMG’s network of firms.