Global

Details

  • Service: Tax, Global Indirect Tax
  • Type: Business and industry issue
  • Date: 11/16/2012

India - Expansion of reverse charge mechanism 

GITB banner
The transaction tax for services in India is called Service Tax. The Union Budget 2012 (with effect from 1 July 2012), has significantly revamped the Service Tax law, including amendments to the rules on zero rating, exports, set-offs, credits and the definition of ‘service’.

Another change includes expanding the scope of the reverse charge mechanism, making the service recipient liable to pay Service Tax, instead of the service provider. Under the previous regime, the reverse charge mechanism was limited to services such as goods transport agencies, sponsorships or import transactions.


The scope is now also expanded to include services such as legal services by individual lawyers or firms of lawyers, specified support services provided by the government, works contracts services, supplies of manpower and services provided by directors, cab rentals, etc.


In addition to increasing the number and type of services, for certain services such as (a) renting a motor passenger vehicle to any person who is not in a similar line of business, (b) supplying manpower and (c) the service element of works contracts, both service provider and service recipient are each proportionally liable for Service Tax (referred to as ‘partial reverse charge mechanism’). However, the liability under partial reverse charge mechanism arises only if the service provider is an individual or partnership firm or an association of persons (AOP).


While the apparent intention behind including these services is to reduce payment defaults by such specified persons, many small players in the industry, including traders, will have to bear the additional burden of Service Tax compliance.


There are practical difficulties in tracking day-to-day petty expenses (such as routine maintenance, small repairs, and printing) which could be liable to Service Tax as ‘works contract service’. Nor has the term ‘AO P’ been defined in the Service Tax law. There is therefore uncertainty as to whether it means all types of joint consortiums/ ventures. As regards ongoing vendor contracts for services, there are interpretational challenges in affixing/quantifying liability, in spite of the clarifications issued by the government. Tax payers will undoubtedly have to update their systems to prepare for the new reverse charge regime, such as tracking vendors in respect of which partial reverse charge mechanism applies, maintaining separate records required to credit the tax, and reviewing vendor contracts.


 

Share this

Share this

Follow us

follow us on Twitter
follow us on Linkedin

Get in touch with KPMG

Contact

Pratik Jain

+91 9811141868

Global Indirect Tax Brief: November 2012

world map
This edition features updates on key tax issues and challenges in indirect tax being faced by taxpayers in countries around the world.

More Global Indirect Tax Briefs