header
Financial Reporting Update Issue 63 – December 2010

Amendments to HKAS 12, Income taxes - Deferred tax: Recovery of underlying assets

22 December 2010

Amendments to HKAS 12 - Deferred tax: Recovery of underlying assets

The HKICPA has recently issued amendments to HKAS 12, Income taxes – Deferred tax: Recovery of underlying assets, to maintain convergence of HKFRS with IFRS. The amendments to HKAS 12 are identical to those made to IAS 12, issued by the IASB in December, with the same effective date.

The amendments stem from the proposals published by the IASB for comment in September 2010. As highlighted in our Financial Reporting Update Issue 59, the proposals addressed concerns, which have been expressed in Hong Kong and a number of other jurisdictions, that the current requirements of IAS 12, and consequently HKAS 12, result in deferred tax being accrued on revaluation gains which may never be taxable or may be taxed at a significantly different rate on disposal than has been used to measure the deferred tax liability.

In response to the above concerns, the IASB has now amended IAS 12 by introducing a rebuttable presumption that deferred tax on investment property carried at fair value under IAS 40, Investment property, shall be measured reflecting the tax consequences of recovering the carrying amount of the investment property entirely through sale. For example, in Hong Kong, this will generally result in the deferred tax liability on investment properties being limited to the tax effect of any claw back of depreciation allowances that would occur on sale at the current carrying amount, as there is currently no capital gains tax in Hong Kong.  This rebuttable presumption is contained in a new paragraph 51C.

The rebuttable presumption shall also apply when deferred tax arises from measuring investment property at fair value in a business combination if the entity will use the fair value model when subsequently measuring that investment property. This is intended to ensure that the measurement of deferred taxes at the acquisition date is consistent with the subsequent measurement of the same deferred taxes.

According to paragraph 51C, the presumption is rebutted when the investment property is depreciable and is “held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits embodied in the investment property over time, rather than through sale”. This rebuttal will only apply where the property's economic life is limited to such an extent that the entity expects that the asset’s income-generating ability will wear out while the asset is still owned by the entity. For example, this rebuttal would apply when the title to the properties is for a limited period, which cannot be renewed without the payment of a market-based premium, and the entity expects to hold the properties until the current title expires. This is not expected to be common in Hong Kong given the Government's current land policy in respect of lease renewals, but may be encountered outside of Hong Kong, for example in the PRC. If the presumption is rebutted then the deferred tax arising from the revaluation of the investment property is measured on the basis of the tax consequences of recovering the carrying amount through use.

The exposure draft published in September proposed that the above exception would also apply to property, plant and equipment or intangible assets measured using the revaluation model in IAS 16, Property, plant and equipment or IAS 38, Intangible assets. However, in view of the comments from respondents stating that many assets in this category are recovered by use rather than sale, the IASB decided to limit the scope of the exception to investment properties carried at fair value under IAS 40.

The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012 with earlier application permitted. The amendments do not contain any transitional provisions, which means that they need to be applied retrospectively in accordance with HKAS 8, Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors. The amendments also incorporate the guidance in HK(SIC) Interpretation 21, Income taxes – Recovery of revalued non-depreciable assets into the text of HKAS 12 in the form of a new paragraph 51B. Therefore, the Interpretation will be superseded upon the effective date of the amendments.

Please talk with your usual KPMG contact if you would like further assistance on the matters discussed.

KPMG China's Financial Reporting Updates are produced regularly to highlight developments in Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards. If at any time you would like further information on the matters discussed in the Updates, please talk to your usual KPMG contact. An archive of recent issues of Financial Reporting Update can be found at http://www.kpmg.com/cn/en/IssuesAndInsights/
ArticlesPublications/Newsletters/Financial-Reporting-Update/
Pages/default.aspx
.

 

 


Privacy & Disclaimer

© 2010 KPMG Advisory (China) Limited, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in China and KPMG Huazhen, a Sino-foreign joint venture in China, are member firms of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

© 2010 KPMG, a Hong Kong partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.